Incline
  • Home
  • Submissions
  • About

Overseas Investment Concerns: Where's the Beef?

10/10/2015

 
Picture
​​Author: Cassandra Shih
 
Debate over Chinese investment in New Zealand agriculture has re-emerged following Shanghai Maling’s acquisition of 50 percent of New Zealand’s largest meat processor, Silver Fern Farms (SFF). Despite Ministers blocking Shanghai Pengxin’s application to buy Lochinver Station in September, New Zealand remains open to foreign investment provided it is likely to deliver greater benefits for New Zealand than comparative local investment. With Shanghai Maling’s $261 million bid significantly stronger than its $90 million late challenger, SFF shareholders will probably vote in favour of the partnership when they meet on 16 October. From there, Overseas Investment Office (OIO) approval is expected to take six to nine months.
 
As the Lochinver decision demonstrates, Ministers do not need to follow an OIO recommendation. However, SFF’s weak financial position, Shanghai Maling’s connections in China, the joint partnership structure of the deal and the fact the transaction does not involve any significant amount of land all point towards the sale getting the statutory and political green light. Furthermore, following concern over the Lochinver decision by high-ranking Chinese officials the Government will be keen to show it hasn’t soured to Chinese investment.
Whether the deal is good for New Zealand farmers depends on whose story you believe. SFF Chairman Rob Hewett has denied “getting married for the money” and says that the partnership with Shanghai Maling is based on mutual commerical interest and belief in the SFF brand. Critics argue that Shanghai Maling, which owns 800 supermarkets in China and has indirect access to thousands more, has little incentive to invest in distribution channels outside of China or shift profits upstream. Their fear is that New Zealand farmers will become ‘locked in’ to supplying China, reverting to “bit players at the bottom of the value chain” while Shanghai Maling scoops the rewards.
 
The problem with this argument is that it is not unique to Shanghai Maling. It applies to any company with distribution channels and extensive retail presence overseas, characteristics that make Shanghai Maling attractive to begin with. The question is not therefore whether New Zealand businesses will ‘lose control’ by partnering with overseas companies, but whether they can afford not to. The scale of most New Zealand businesses means they cannot afford to acquire controlling stakes in large distributors or retailers overseas. The alternatives of setting up from scratch or entering supply contracts with retail chains simply replicate the same types of concerns. New Zealand businesses have to be willing to dance with bigger partners if they want to dance at all.
 
It’s important to address concerns about the long-term implications for New Zealand’s meat industry. It’s been suggested that the SFF sale could end up pushing the country’s second-largest meat processor, Alliance, out of business. Alliance, for their part, would fight hard to keep their suppliers on board, and farmers who prefer a 100% New Zealand-owned model are free to switch over. Regardless, the real issue is not whether one processor eventually comes to dominate the market, but whether competition is fairly managed. Anti-competitive behaviour is illegal, but paying suppliers more for premium products is not. Shanghai Maling’s 38 per cent stakeholder Bright Foods already offers a premium for grassfed milk through its subsidiary milk processor Synlait.
 
An argument that takes a slightly different tack is that New Zealand should endeavour to keep ‘iconic’ brands in New Zealand ownership. This argument could have merit but lacks articulation and is inconsistently raised. Much less public attention was generated by the sale of snack-maker Griffins to a Philippines-based company last year for $750 million. Admittedly, Griffins has a long history of foreign ownership, but there was no campaign for New Zealand bidders to band together and ‘retake’ the brand as SFF is currently experiencing. There is also low public awareness around existing levels of foreign ownership in agriculture. For example, French beverage giant Pernod Ricard counts New Zealand wine labels Brancott Estate, Corbans, Montana, Saints and Stoneleigh among its vast stable of brands and uses its vertically integrated structure to more efficiently export New Zealand wine overseas.

​One final concern to be addressed is that the SFF deal could promote excessive reliance on the Chinese market. The Government is aware of a public perception of a ‘China dependency’ problem and has become increasingly vocal about its efforts to diversify New Zealand’s economy, both in terms of the products New Zealand exports and the export destinations. On a recent visit to Malaysia, Trade Minister Groser described the NZ-ASEAN free trade agreement as New Zealand’s “number one insurance policy if things go the wrong way in China.” As long as alternative markets for New Zealand meat remain viable - and with the recent signing of the TPP this is certain to be the case - the China dependency problem will remain insignificant.
 
Shanghai Maling may not end up making SFF as famous as Coca-Cola but it shouldn’t have to in order to be considered a good business partner. SFF made a $31 million loss in 2012, a $29 million loss in 2013, and a $500,000 profit last year. Not much to write home about for a company with $2 billion in annual revenue. SFF’s outlook may be improving, but that doesn’t mean it should be business as usual for the co-operative. Shanghai Maling’s facilties, expertise and stores could be exactly what SFF needs to lift its performance and in the absence of a good reason why this investment is more objectionable than what New Zealand has arranged with others it should be allowed to proceed on its merits.

Photo credit: Deborah Macleod / Fairfax
​
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Comments are closed.

    About

    Incline is a New Zealand-based project that publishes original analysis and commentary on issues and trends that impact New Zealand's international relations. 

    To get new posts delivered by email directly to your inbox, sign up below.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.